google-site-verification=w8dBP0oN7_5zfz3BhWTpt7x2hFhYKhjavAlSPkeo8x0

Why Opponents’ Dirty Tactics are so Effective for Decision Makers

Why Opponents’ Dirty Tactics are so Effective for Decision Makers

by

Why Opponents’ Dirty Tactics are so Effective for Decision Makers

Hard problems are hard to solve.

As subject matter experts, most of your solutions will have serious drawbacks.

Do NOT expect negatively impacted stakeholders to like your proposal!

Some will even resort to “playing dirty”, attack you personally, or dispense mis-information to get you to stop.

A listener to our monthly webinar asked:

What can I do when their use of misinformation to lobby decision-makers is successful?

How can I correct the misinformation in a way decision-makers might be able to consider if they are somewhat swayed by the tactics of opponents?

It’s true, you need to be concerned when a policymaker is swayed by the tactics (especially dirty tactics) of an opponent.

You must be careful not to attack the person directly, only his position and possibly behavior.

But take a deeper look at what’s causing this situation.

The reason these tactics work (regardless of how legitimate the opponent’s tactics are) is because there’s some doubt as to how…

  • – Fair
  • – Caring
  • – Responsive, and/or
  • – Responsible to the Mission your team was in relation to this opponent.

If there’s ANY doubt that you played fair, that you listened, that you actually cared about the negative impacts your work will have on an opponent — you can expect policymakers to be swayed by their argument.

Even when based on mis-information!

Even if only 1% of what they say is true!

Think about it…

Opponents are MORE effective when they play dirty!

By calling your level of concern, compassion, or fairness into question — they are sure to grab decision-makers’ attention.

These (dirty) tactics are useful information themselves.

Critical information for you.

Dirty tactics are an indication that a stakeholder feels justified in suspending his own need to be fair… His own values.

Opponents who use mis-information and dis-information are sending you a deeper signal: that they don’t trust YOU.

Even more important than revealing these tactics to decision-makers, you need to understand WHY an opponent feels justified in using these tactics.

If you don’t understand why a stakeholder is spreading mis-information, or using unfair tactics, you won’t plug the well from which these ploys spring.

 

Prevent dirty tactics from having their intended impact, and stay on track to fulfilling your Mission by streaming access anytime to our Consent-Building Library.

The Key Differences Between Private & Public Sector Work

The Key Differences Between Private & Public Sector Work

by

The Key Differences Between Private & Public Sector Work

There are so many aspects that make your public service work different from private-sector work. Some differences are obvious. While the most significant are not.

Even if you’ve had experience in both the public and the private-sector, chances are you haven’t fully wrapped your head around THE fundamental difference between the two.

But the differences are crucial to understand.

Why is this important?

 

  1. Without a thorough awareness of what separates the two types of work, you’ll lack the ability to articulate WHY your organization is the best entity to do the work you do.
  2. When there’s so much talk about turning everything over to the private-sector, you need to understand when this does and does NOT make sense.
  3. More importantly, you need to get the public you serve — as well as political appointees — to come to that same conclusion.

Otherwise, 5-10 years from now, they’ll just reinvent you all over again… Meanwhile, your work and its solutions sit on a shelf, gathering dust

Get Off On The Right Foot

This year, we’re making sure your year is off to a good start, by taking a close look at the critical differences between your public-sector work and the exact same technical work in the private-sector.

  1. Two differences have to do with accountability and choices.

When you’re working for a corporation, stockholders can sell their shares if they conclude you’re management methods don’t align with their values and perceptions.

Not so in the public-sector.There, the public is stuck with you!To add salt to the wound, the funding comes from taxpayers’ dollars.  So not only can’t they sell their share of the “company,” they are forced to keep paying for your work.

  1. Public professionals don’t have it easy either! 

The edge isn’t just felt by the public, particularly when it comes to accountability…

Because in the private-sector, you only need to please the owner, or the board.Whereas you have the difficult task of pleasing a diverse and diametrically different public, that is almost guaranteed NOT to agree.

And while these are fundamental to the differences between public and private work, there is a difference even bigger than these…!

Any guess what it is?!?

Here’s where you can find out. Click to get access to our Consent-Building Library.

Why Opponents’ Dirty Tactics are so Effective for Decision Makers

Developing Trust with Extremists

by

What’s become known as the “Aarhus Model” is an interesting take on developing trust with extremists — even those who are tempted to flee to Syria and support ISIS.

It touches on the underpinnings of what we discussed in this month’s Consent-Building Clinic #83, and what we’ve taught in our CPO-2 course that focuses on dealing with extremists.

Listening to opponents Trust and Extremism

That is, it’s not enough to say you care — you have to demonstrate it.

Look into the work of a handful of detectives in the Danish town of Aarhus, who rather than vilify teenagers tempted to join ISIS fighters in Syria, asked them to meet for coffee and then actually listened to how they became so disaffected with their homeland.

For many, if not most of those burgeoning terrorists, being heard caused them to finally believe what the officials and others were saying: they DID care about these youths and their frustrations.

Moreover, the police detectives acknowledged and validated the source of the teenagers’ feelings.

They HAD been treated unfairly, and while that was true they need not abandon Denmark and become radicalized to even the score.

Also laid out before them was that if they continued down the path of terrorism offered by ISIS, these teenagers could expect a grim future . . .

Listen to one of the nearly radicalized teens retell the story in the July 2016 Invisibilia podcast episode “Flipping the Script”.

You’ll hear him say that by simply listening to him — he concluded he could trust these detectives.

They gained credibility with him which was the key to turning his extremist attitude around 180 degrees.

As you heard Hans say in this month’s Clinic, dealing with extremists IS dangerous business.

But until you show them you really do want to understand them, you won’t have the essential trust needed to make progress on de-escalating their (Anti-Government) attitudes and behaviors.

Be sure you’re signed up to receive them!

Until next time, let us know what credibility issues you bump up against.

We are here to help YOU!

Anti-Government Groups & Conflict Resolution: Are You Making Matters Worse by How You Define Your “Public”?

by

Things in Burns, Oregon might get have officially turned ugly.

And while the folks at the wildlife refuge in Oregon aren’t your average opponents, their stance isn’t legitimate, there is an element of their stance that no public official should ignore…

Unfortunately, NO ONE is immune from anti-government attitudes.

(Ironically, especially in a democracy… But we’ll cover that topic on March 8th in Clinic #78.)

  • Because this attitude is something you either ARE dealing with or likely WILL be confronted with, we’ve adopted “Anti-Government” as our theme for all of our monthly Consent-Building Clinics in 2016.

In a self-governing society, it’s THE PUBLIC who decides — via our rules based decision-making process — what government institutions it wants to create and maintain.

If you encounter stakeholders who perceive an “Us vs. Them” relationship between the (them) public and (you) the government . . . something’s gone wrong.

Chances are it’s simply a misunderstanding . . . a misperception.

Because even “simple” misperceptions can be challenging to correct, don’t expect that lecturing these folks is going to change their view of the world.

 

Your stakeholders need to discover . . . they need to see — with their own eyes — and conclude on their own terms that it’s ultimately THEY, the people (i.e. all of us) who make all the decisions.

It’s WE, the people, who created your agency and it’s mission.

  • It’s critical that your stakeholders realize this paradigm-changing insight.

But how do you stimulate you stakeholders to have such a critical insight? 

 

While there’s no quick-fix, there IS much you can do.

The first of which begins by answering 6 Questions

  • In addition to the recording of this webinar, we’ve created a follow-up video with 6 questions to help you make real headway in preventing such attitudes from being aimed at you and your organization.

Starting with the basics in this recorded webinar, we delve into every angle of WHY Anti-Government sentiments are ratcheting up all across the country, and WHAT you can do to diffuse them, and even better yet — PREVENT them in the first place — from impeding your ability to accomplish your mission.

In this session, we’ll cover something so SIMPLE and yet POWERFUL . . .

6 Points We Cover

1. How you DEFINE “public” and “stakeholder” plays a central role in anti-government attitudes towards you and your agency.

2. Whom should you INCLUDE and EXCLUDE in your definition?

3. Should your definition of your “public” and related “stakeholders” SHIFT from project to project?

4. How should you handle people who THINK they are affected?

5. What’s the appropriate ROLE of number of constituents, majority vs. minority opinions, and representativeness?

6. How to identify WHICH of the 4 Fundamental Points your team is failing to address.

 

Don’t be caught off guard by anti-government attitudes that are sweeping the country!

 

Social Media: A Tool or Weapon for Informed Consent Building?

by

Social Media is so much more than a high-tech medium.
But you already knew that, right?

It’s what we call, a “Meta Consent-Building Tool”.

IF (big IF!) you know how to use it, it can do SO much for your effectiveness, credibility, and legitimacy.

Of course, it could just as easily ruin you.

That’s the thing, it’s a great tool, or a weapon — depending on HOW and WHO is using it!

This webinar is geared JUST FOR YOU — if you ever ask yourself:

    • Should we use Social Media? Or will it just put a big target on our back?!?
    • How the heck do we know what to post?
    • What are the risks for a public-sector organization like ours (and/or our clients)?
    • Is there a recipe we can follow when using Social Media?
    • What if someone is using Social Media to spread rumors and misinformation?
    • How do we get the public to engage with us in a meaningful way?
    • What can we do when someone post their opinions as “facts”?

Even if you aren’t ready to get our Guide to Cracking the Code on Digital Engagement & Social Media, you can still download our FREE 7-Point Social Media Checklist.

  • These tools were designed with YOU and your public-sector mission (and critics) in mind.

Why Your Website Needs a Makeover to improve informed consent

by

We’re often asked: “How should we use our agency’s website, Facebook page, Twitter feed . . . to engage with our public?” 

It’s a great question. (One that you won’t find answers for, even if you Google your heart out trying.)

You’re not an employee in a business — so going after “leads” and “conversions” doesn’t translate well into the mission the public gave you.

Yet, your public expects you to have an online presence….!

But how do you do it?!?

Rightly so, you’re probably concerned about:

  • Staff hours spent generating and monitoring Social Media platforms
  • The risk of posts taking on a life of their own and backfiring on the organization
  • Giving the impression everything is up for popularity vote
  • Only scratching the surface on complex projects, and as a result — creating false impression of the key issues
  • Technology and Terms of Use for 3rd Party Platforms change frequently
  • What constitutes “engagement?”  Is it a legitimate objective?
  • What’s the best way to reach our public?
  • “Do people even look at our website anymore?!?”

 

We’ll answer these questions, your specific questions — and more — in our monthly Consent-Building Clinic.

 

During Clinic #74, we’re going to show you:

  • How VITAL your agency’s website is,
  • Why we can virtually guarantee you’re FAILING to use it to inform your public,
  • and Why you’re priorities are all WRONG.

Then, even though we only have 45-minutes with you, we’re going to really shake things up!

Because we’ve got advice that is loaded with value on how to turn your website into a Consent-Building powerhouse.

 

Don’t miss the BONUS video below on “Adding some Kryptonite for Your Opponents on Your Website”

 

Follow these tips and not only will you generate trust, respect, credibility and legitimacy.

Even your work’s fiercest opponents will conclude you’re committed to being fair and transparent (assuming you are!).

Get the Recording