Bleiker Consent Building

Resolve Conflict Gridlock & Get More Effective Decisions through Consent Building

  • About
    • the Bleikers
    • Our “Hidden” Agenda
  • Clients
    • Nearly 40,000 TRAINED
    • Sampling of Professions Served
    • Testimonials
  • Training
    • Why Public Work Is Harder
    • Where to Start
    • Consent Building
      • Why Not Consensus?
      • SDIC: Systematic Development of Informed Consent
      • Leadership Bootcamp
      • Professional Ethics
      • Commission / Staff Relations
      • Dealing with Domestic Terrorists
      • Personal Decision Making
    • Up-Coming Training
    • Monthly Webinar (Clinic)
      • Clinic Schedule
      • Subscription Access to Past Clinics
  • Work with Us
    • Open Training
    • Train Your Team
    • Coaching for Existing Students
    • Contact the Bleikers
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • Citizen Participation Handbook
    • Just-in-Time Materials
    • Bleiker Newsletter
    • Free Resources
  • Student Login

Using the Stagelights Tactic

What Can I Do When Some Stakeholders Play Dirty?

In discussing how the Stagelights Tactic gets stakeholders who play dirty to clean up their act, I wanted to add a subtle – but very important – point.

The Stagelights shame the player into better behavior; that much is observable. Psychologically, however, what I believe REALLY happens is this: the misbehaving stakeholders discover – because the bright Stagelights don’t allow them to ignore it – that their misbehavior is violating THEIR OWN values.

Why Most People Will Choose to Stop Playing Dirty

Remember from the previous Brownbag session on American Values (January 2011), what happens when something (such as our own misbehavior) violates our values: our Quality-of-Life suffers. Well, we don’t like that. So, we may choose to do ourselves a favor: often times, we choose to change our behavior so that it aligns with our personal values.

Notice, we do this for the SELFISH reason of not doing any further damage to our own Quality-of-Life.

Looking at the Values Hierarchy (page 18 of the February 2011 Brownbag handout), the values that most likely are involved in this 2nd, 3rd, and 4th levels of that hierarchy:

  • Level 2: Process-Related Values, i.e. issues of Fairness
  • Level 3: Meta-Values, which are issues of Rights, Freedoms, and Liberties
  • Level 4: Meta-Meta-Values, are issues of Responsibilities . . . which is the same as Limitations of Rights, Freedoms, and Liberties

What’s going on psychologically with the Stagelights Tactic is yet another reason for you to become a “Student of Values.” And, with that, of course, we’re talking about American Values. Americans have amazingly similar 2nd, 3rd, and 4th – level Higher Values.

That’s why in the Stagelights examples that I gave (the US Forest Service’s overhaul of its Electronic Site Leasing Fees in New Mexico and in Arizona, the Land-Use Planning incident in Laramie, WY where the Mayor talked out of both sides of his mouth, and the Los Angeles planning case where an LA City Councilor did the same thing) we could predict that – once the misbehaving stakeholders HAD TO look at their behavior – because the public-at-large was looking at that behavior – they would choose to change it.

But, as I warned you during the Brownbag session: Don’t rush into the Stagelights Tactic. It DOES constitute a form of hardball. Be sure you’ve thought it through. Be sure to “get license” to use it (which is NOT the same as asking for permission to use it.) BEFORE you go very far with it.

Remember the key phrase in getting the public’s and the stakeholders’ license: “We owe it to you . . . We owe it to you to tell you who we’re talking to, what we’re hearing, what we’re thinking . . .“

Of equal importance, be sure the light you shine is directed at the person’s behavior, not the person directly. This is the underpinning of providing constructive criticism, rather than destructive criticism.

Related Posts

  • Why Opponents’ Dirty Tactics are so Effective for Decision MakersWhy Opponents’ Dirty Tactics are so Effective for Decision Makers
  • Becoming a Student of American Values for Developing Informed ConsentBecoming a Student of American Values for Developing Informed Consent
  • Anti-Government Groups & Conflict Resolution: Are You Making Matters Worse by How You Define Your “Public”?Anti-Government Groups & Conflict Resolution: Are You Making Matters Worse by How You Define Your “Public”?
  • 2 Key Ingredients to Establish Legitimacy for Regulators2 Key Ingredients to Establish Public Legitimacy for Agency Regulators

Categorized: Consent-Building Clinics, Leadership, Legitimacy, Past Consent-Building Clinics · Tagged: Abuse of Public Officials, Secrecy in Government

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Effectiveness Training

SDIC 2.0: Systematic Development of Informed Consent
This is a blended course with 2 days of in-person training, and delivery of 4 online modules with peer engagement and direct feedback from the Bleikers

Austin, TX
December 3 – 5, 2019
Learn More

Monterey, CA
January 29 – 31, 2020
Learn More

Lakewood, CO
May 2020
Registration Coming

CPO: Citizen Participation by Objectives
*Now taught online as 1 of 4 Modules in the SDIC 2.0 course!

Consent-Building Clinics

These monthly webinars last 45-60 minutes, and only cost $90 for your entire organization to join, even less for annual subscribers.
December 10th @ 10am PT
How to Deal with Both kinds of Polarized Stakeholders

Subscription to Upcoming & Past Clinics

Subscribe for a year of "Live" Clinics, and receive access to ALL past recordings.

gives EVERYONE in your organization access

Subscription is $1370
Get Details

Search

Hans, Annemarie & Jennifer Bleiker
PO Box 1937; Monterey, CA 93942
Tel: (831) 373-4292 – Fax: (831) 373-0760
Email: jennifer@consentbuilding.com

  • Contact Bleiker Consent Building
  • Facebook

© 2019 · Powered by Genesis Framework · Design by: Bellano Web Studio